Do you think a WCAG 2.0 technique can be improved? Let the W3C know.
While going through Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, I have noted that some of the Techniques for WCAG 2.0 could be improved, at least in my opinion.
In some cases it’s a simple typo, in other cases the technique doesn’t describe what I would consider current best practice. The good thing is that the technique documents aren’t set in stone like the main WCAG 2.0 document is.
If you have suggestions for improvement to a WCAG 2.0 technique (or any other WCAG 2.0 document), the WAI web site has a page with Instructions for Commenting on WCAG 2.0 Documents.
I haven’t done so yet, but I hope to be able to find time to go through the techniques and send in my feedback.
- Previous post: Using the Web with a refreshable Braille display
- Next post: Accessibility improvements in Mac OS X Snow Leopard
Comments are disabled for this post (read why), but if you have spotted an error or have additional info that you think should be in this post, feel free to contact me.
Subscribe / follow
Sponsors
Authentic Jobs
- Junior Designer & Front-ender at QueryClick (Edinburgh, UK, GB)
- PHP Developer at LM&O Advertising (Baltimore, MD, Ma, US)
- Mid to Senior User Experience Designer at Momentum Design Lab (San Francisco, CA, Ca, US)
- Frontend Developer at Momentum Design Lab (San Francisco, CA, US)
DreamHost web hosting
Use the promo code 456BEREASTREET3 to save USD 20 when you sign up for DreamHost

