Validity and Accessibility
Why is the WCAG working group lowering the importance of validity by moving it? Gez Lemon has taken a look at the minutes from a recent WCAG working group meeting and found some very disturbing info. Read Validity and Accessibility for his comments.
Unless I’m completely misunderstanding something, this sounds like a really stupid move. One of the reasons given is this:
Current WYSIWYG and CMS tools do not necessarily generate valid code, making it difficult or impossible for many authors to meet this SC. (We cannot force authors to do manual coding to conform to WCAG.)
Hello? It’s the tools that need to be fixed and the developers and authors that need to upgrade their skills, not the guidelines that should be dumbed down.
Update: Matt May explains why this was done in A principled argument. I agree with the reasons, but I am still worried about the consequences.
Subscribe / follow
- Android Mobile Developer at Quirky (New York City or San Francisco, Ca, US)
- UX/Creative Media Designer at Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) (Las Vegas, NV, Ne, US)
- Talented Web Designers & PHP Developers - Let's Talk! at Advant Interactive (Venice, CA, Ca, US)
- Front-end Developer at charity: water (New York, NY, Ne, US)
DreamHost web hosting
Use the promo code 456BEREASTREET3 to save USD 20 when you sign up for DreamHost