Statistics defence
Why the ‘statistics defence’ doesn’t stand up contains arguments against the “statistics defence” many people use as an excuse for ignoring accessibility.
- Previous post: Microsoft.com Redesign
- Next post: Flexible news list
Subscribe / follow
Sponsors
Authentic Jobs
- User Experience (UX) Specialist at Kleinfelder (Cambridge, MA or Framingham, MA or Denver, CO or Sacramento, CA or San Diego, CA, Ca, US)
- Front-end Drupal Developer at Cheeky Monkey Media (Kelowna, British Columbia, CA)
- Front End Developer at Fervor Creative (Scottsdale, AZ, Ar, US)
- Senior/Lead Front-End/UX Developer at Loft (Shoreditch, London, GB)
DreamHost web hosting
Use the promo code 456BEREASTREET3 to save USD 20 when you sign up for DreamHost


Comments
My view is that, yes, the site should be viewable in Netscape 4.x and older browsers, but that you shouldn’t waste time designing for them. Instead, serve them the symantic XHTML version with either a basic style sheet to make it a nicer font or just leave them the plain non-styled XHTML. That way you provide them the content without wasting time which could be spent improving the site in other ways and always offering a gentle nudge to get with the program and download a later generation browser.
Agreed. That’s what I’ve been doing for almost 2 years now. Non-CSS browsers get plain XHTML. Ugly perhaps, but accessible, usable, and much better than being redirected to an “upgrade page”.
Comments are disabled for this post (read why), but if you have spotted an error or have additional info that you think should be in this post, feel free to contact me.